We do not (yet) have good systemic data on the extent of pro se/self represented litigation in Texas, and the National Center for State Courts advises that no one else has it either (which still surprised me, as many states have more consolidated case management systems capable of gathering better data than we get); what NCSC says is “lots of anecdotal evidence but no consistent data.” Richard Zorza, a national consultant on these issues, agrees that the data is chaotic. In lieu of better data, he has previously cited the following information in the 2009 Future Trends in State Courts report that NCSC produces (see http://www.ncsconline.org/WC/Publications/Trends/Archives.html):
Last week a judge estimated that pro se divorces run about 45% of all his divorce filings. I have recent data point from another Texas county that squarely supports this estimate. So, applying that 45% estimate as a statewide assumption for that case type, there were approximately 61,000 pro se divorces in 2010. If you make the same 45% assumption for all other family law matters, add another 112,000 to that. (And by the way, divorces in Texas are declining per capita over the last 20 years, a 7% increase in filings over that time, despite 43% population growth.)
It is no surprise that the economic crisis is dramatically impacting both the numbers and proportion of self-represented litigants. In a 2009 survey conducted by the Self-Represented Litigation Network, between 50 and 60 percent of judges reported higher caseloads and a higher percentage of the self-represented as a result of the crisis (with many reporting both). Only 27 percent reported no impact, and many of those were criminal-court judges (see figure below). Some courts and judges are also seeing many more middle-class litigants coming to court without lawyers. Some of these litigants are reported to have higher expectations of how they will be treated and to be more prone to frustration with the situation and how courts are managing it.
We do have one area of very good statewide data on pro se litigation, in small claims courts, which are pro se by definition. Filings are down some over time, and certainly down per capita. Evictions may be a countervailing trend but we don’t have good data on pro se representation. My counterparts in California advise that 90% of tenants go unrepresented in their courts.